If you have any rhetorical questions of your own, please help add to this list.
Isn't the PLO "the sole, legitimate representative" of the Palestinian Arabs?
When will all those who blasted Israel for avoiding dealing with the PLO acknowledge everyone, especially the Palestinian Arabs, would all be better off if Israel had never caved in to the pressure to deal with the PLO?
If the PLO is "the sole, legitimate representative" of the Palestinian Arabs, how come Hamas, which isn't even a part of the PLO, got elected to run the Palestinian Authority?
Is it time to start talking about a "four state solution?" (Hamastan, Fatahstan, Jordan, Israel)
Why do we always pressure Israel to make concessions that don't do anyone any good?
Why do we always pressure Israel to ignore it when the Palestinian Arabs violate every agreement?
If the Palestinian Arabs can't adhere to a cease fire among themselves, why does anyone think it's so important to have a cease fire between them and Israel for them to similarly ignore?
Friday, June 15, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment